Have any of you
had a sense of curiosity about your past, some interest in what the world was
like back when you were younger and didn’t have a sense of scale or
understanding of the world outside of your line of sight? Well, that’s the main
motivator I had for this, so let’s talk about 1991.
Looking
back, this wasn’t exactly a big or even memorable year, which you’d think it
would be considering some of the events that occurred. The Gulf War concluded,
Comedy Central was launched, the SNES was released, the Dissolution of the
Soviet Union pretty much reached its conclusion by the end of the year, Theodor
Suess Geisel a.k.a. Dr. Seuss died, Freddie Mercury of Queen died, and on the
topic of music, a lot of the trends of the time also seemed to be dying.
In
terms of the music, 1991 was one of the transitional years, the point that
represented the death of the trends of the past and the buds of the trends that
would soon follow. For those of you that only really think of Nirvana when you
think of 1991, trust me when I say that is not an accurate analysis of the
year; Nirvana weren’t even relevant to the music scene until around the last
quarter of the year at the earliest. Instead, most of the hits from this year
consisted of what I can only describe as the 1980s’ rotten leftovers, and the
seeds that would ultimately result in the trends of the early-to-mid-‘90s.
There are other things in there, but for the most part 1991 was the awkward
shift between the last two decades of the last millennium.
Now,
with nostalgia and looking back at the events of the past also comes the
inevitable shame of the things one is also forced to associate with it, the
fondness for the pleasant things one remembers from it and surprise at the new
discoveries one uncovers about it. So with this look back at the year of my
birth, I’ll be looking back at all of the big hit songs from this year to
praise the good and condemn the bad.
Now,
keep in mind that this list is pretty much based off of my own personal
opinion, and like any person’s opinion it can differ, sometimes greatly, from
the opinions of others, including and especially those of the public at large.
Therefore, I will state right now that, if a song you like does appear on the
‘worst of’ list, that isn’t meant as an insult directed at you or your opinion;
it just means I personally don’t like it, nothing more. In terms of what makes
a song qualify for the worst list, I mostly went off of the following factors
and questions:
1. The
song had to be on the Billboard Hot 100 Year-End chart for this year, place in
the top 20 or maintain a position in the top 40 for more than 5 weeks.
2. I
had to ask myself the following two questions when listening to each song:
a. What
is the goal the song set for itself and did it accomplish it?
b. Does
the song cause any kind of frustration, anguish or distress to me when
listening to it?
Before
we get into the list proper, I’ll start by listing off some songs that just
barely missed making the cut:
Rico Suave (Gerardo)
I
seriously considered putting this on the list, but ultimately decided not to
because the production of the song is decent. In fact, Weird Al pretty much
recycled it beat-for-beat when making his parody of this song, which is a lot
better.
I’m Not In Love (Will to Power)
This
song, however, seemed to have almost the exact opposite problem, with the
lyrics and message of the song being okay and the production being just bad.
What ruins this song for me especially is the bass line, and get used to me
saying that because that’s a common problem in a lot of the really bad songs
from this year.
Something In My Heart (Michel’le)
None
of the elements in this song work; the beat’s too slow, the singer’s vocals are
obnoxious, and whoever produced this clearly didn’t bother listening to the
finished product because almost none of the instrumentation fits the song. Of
course, bad production seems to have been another common trait in a lot of the
slower songs that came out this year, as we’ll be seeing once we get into the
list proper.
Let the Beat Hit ‘Em (Lisa Lisa & the
Cult Jam)
This
was the last hit that Lisa Lisa and the Cult Jam managed before they disbanded
this year. It peaked at #37 for one week, then disappeared, and it’s clear why;
the production’s a mess, there are unnecessary commentaries interspersed all
throughout the track and the chorus ends with an incredibly obnoxious
repetition of a single word that makes it sound like the listener’s going
through a bad acid trip. If it hadn’t dropped out of the top 40 so quickly, it
definitely would’ve made the cut.
Round and Round (Tevin Campbell)
I
refuse to believe that Prince wrote and produced this song. The
fifteen-year-old trying to pass himself off as a hot shot by itself is stupid
enough, but the music and beat to this song do not help matters, especially the
bass. The only reason this didn’t make the list was because I couldn’t find a
place to fit it in. I guess you can call this my unofficial #11.
The First Time (Surface)
This
song is part of a long list of dull R&B love ballads that came out this
year. None of these songs have any passion behind them at all, and this song is
no exception. That said, it was at least less painful for me to listen to than
others, and it felt sincere enough, so I gave it a pass.
(Everything I Do) I Do It For You (Brian
Adams)
I
honestly don’t hate this song as much as people seem to think I should. I think
it has no place being the #1 song of this year, but really I just find it more
boring than anything else. In the hands of another band, it still likely
wouldn’t have been very good, but they at least probably might have been able
to deliver it with some level of honesty and earnestness.
She Talks To Angels (The Black Crowes)
This
song, however, has little to no scrap of sincerity to be gleaned from it
whatsoever. It is probably one of the most insincere love songs that came out
this year, but most definitely not the
most insincere. We’ll get to that later though; trust me.
Angel Baby (Angelica)
Yet
another song that easily would’ve qualified for this list had it been an actual
hit. Again, the production and bass line are limp and lifeless enough by
themselves on this song, but throw in the singer’s vocals and it just becomes
like nails on a chalkboard. I feel like she’s channeling Minnie Riverton when
she gets to those higher notes on the chorus.
Now
that’s done, load up on guns and bring your friends because we are counting
down:
…THE TOP 10 WORST
HIT SONGS OF 1991!
#10
One
way in which 1991 contrasts from the music scene today is that religious music
had a bit more of a presence on the pop charts. Now, let me just start by
saying that I am not planning on saying that all religious music sucks;
considering I haven’t really been exposed to a lot of it, I’m not the right
person to make that call. Besides, I didn’t mind any of the hit songs that
contemporary Christian singer Amy Grant released this year. I didn’t actually
like any of them either, but I thought they were okay. Also, if you want to
stretch a bit, you could even argue that the U2 song ‘Mysterious Ways,’ which
also came out this year, was also religious in its theme, and I thought that
song was actually pretty good.
All
that said, I’m still not a fan. There are two major turn-offs for me that tend
to crop up in religious music: the music tends towards either being really
hokey and comes across as trying to cater to the younger, more hip crowd or
just being bland and forgettable, and the lyrics tend to be preachy, uninspired
or ‘holier-than-thou’ in the message they’re trying to convey. If a song has
lyrics that say things like, “Have you found Jesus,” or “Let God into your
heart,” or “You don’t need proof, you just have to believe,” I usually just tune it out; it’s tiresome, it’s
uninteresting and most importantly, it’s not “cool”. Now, with all of that
said, let’s talk about Michael W. Smith.
#10. Place in This World (Michael W. Smith)
Michael
W. Smith was born in Kenova, West Virginia to an oil refinery worker and
developed a love for music through working with his local church; becoming a
devout Christian by the time he was 10. After struggling with the departure of
his older friends to college, he developed drinking and substance abuse
problems, performed with several local bands, and moved to Nashville, getting
involved in the club scene there until November of 1979, when he suffered a
breakdown that lead to him recommitting himself to the church. He then
auditioned for the contemporary Christian music group Higher Ground, starting
out as a keyboardist before being signed as a writer to Meadowgreen Music,
where he wrote music for other artists, including Sandi Patty, Kathy Troccoli,
Bill Gaither and Amy Grant, before eventually writing and releasing his own
solo albums.
Having
now listened to the vast majority of his studio albums, I can safely say that I
don’t think he’s a “bad” musician. In fact, some of his songs actually
surprised me with decent production and fairly well thought-out lyrics, though
I think some of his instrumental songs tended to be better than the songs with
lyrics and singing, since they let his, at times, fairly lovely music
composition skills do most of the work. That said, he still tends to fall into
the issues I mentioned regarding religious music above in terms of lyrics, and
way too many of his songs, especially off of his first few albums, tended to be
rather samey-sounding, to the point that I couldn’t always tell when one song
ended and the next song began.
Fortunately,
I can safely say that ‘Place In This World’ does not suffer from that second
issue; it is rather distinct compared to most of his music. So, why did I put
it on this list? Well, there are a couple of nitpicks I have about the song; I
feel like the production’s not his best, and the lyrics don’t paint a very good
picture of what the narrator’s trying to convey in terms of ‘finding his place
in this world’. However, there is one thing about this song in particular that
makes it especially unlistenable for me: Michael
W. Smith’s vocals on this song are terrible! His voice sounds so nasal on
this song that every time he scrapes the peak of his vocal range to hit those
higher notes during the chorus it sounds like he’s about to sneeze his brain
out of his nose like in ‘Psychonauts’! I don’t know if it’s just poor-quality
recording equipment, poor blending of his vocals with the production or if he
actually did sound that bad at the time, but regardless, I wince every time I
hear that almost muppet-like vocal performance. I realize that some of you would argue that poor vocals on a
song aren’t really enough grounds on their own for me to label a song as one of
the worst songs of a given year, and that there are other factors to consider.
However, in response, I have this to say: in a slow, dull, energy-devoid ballad
like this, where the instrumentation’s this lackluster and the lyrics this
forgettable, the vocals are the only possibly decent, interesting thing left
for the listener to take from the song. For underwritten ballads like this one,
the singer’s vocals are the backbone of the entire song, and if they aren’t
good enough to carry the song on their own, or if they’re so bad that they
actively contribute to the song’s shortcomings like they do here, then it has
no way of standing.
Now,
as I said, I don’t think Michael W. Smith is a terrible musician; I did hear
occasional songs in his discography that I liked. ‘All I Need to Say,’ off of his second album, and ‘All
You’re Missin’ is a Heartache’ from his fourth, are decent songs about the
sadness of love lost and learning to move past it, while ‘Missing Person,’
which he released seven years after ‘Place in This World,’ is basically
everything this song failed to be, presenting an interesting story of a
once-devoted man struggling with his crisis in faith. The production and lyrics
on those songs are very good, and the vocals are phenomenally better than they
are here, where it sounds like he’s turning in a bad audition for the role of a
male lead in a Disney animated movie. Hell, there are better songs than ‘Place
In This World’ that are on the same album
as it! Then again, there are also much worse songs on that album as well,
so I guess it’s a bit of a mixed bag.
Michael
W. Smith has continued releasing albums since the success of this song,
including four compilation albums, four live albums and about thirty
collaboration albums, so it looks like he’s still doing well for himself.
Still, I just have this to say: he may be struggling to find his place in this
world, but I can think of only one suitable place for this song: the musical
garbage bin of irrelevance and forgotten pop tripe. Good riddance!
#9
Well,
it wouldn’t be a complete examination of pop music from the ‘90s if I didn’t
discuss ‘90s boy bands, would it? I know that boy bands weren’t new to this
time period; groups like the Beach Boys, the Beatles and the Monkeys were
around back in the ‘60s, and NKOTB originated back in the ‘80s. However, the
‘90s seem to be the time frame most associated with these particular types of
groups. And since we’re going by the 20-year nostalgia rule, they’ve started
popping up again in the mainstream today.
Now,
since we’re still in the period of the early ‘90s, we’re not going to be
looking at the acts that would go on to become most associated with this time
frame like the ‘NSYNC’s or the ‘Backstreet Boys’s the world over. At this point
in time boy bands were not as dynamic, with the acts at the time including
groups like Boyz II Men, who were arguably the best of the groups whose hits I
heard from this year, and Color Me Badd, who were kind of punchable douche bags
but little else in terms of badness. So, as a representation of the worst of
this particular time frame’s presentation of the genre, I’d like to introduce
you to a five-boy R&B group known simply as Hi-Five.
#9. I Can’t Wait Another Minute (Hi-Five)
Some
of you would argue that Hi-Five are not technically classified as a ‘boy band,’
but if you were to listen to any one of their songs you’d likely notice that
the subject matter and songwriting, particularly the lyrics, tended to match
the same formula used by these groups: vague, insincere lyrics about trying to
seduce any younger, or sometimes older women listening to the song, but painted
just tamely enough to not set off any red flags for the listener.
Unfortunately, I’m not sure they were tame enough for this particular song,
since it’s rather explicit about what the boys are asking for. That’s right,
random, nameless, teenage fan-girl; they “can’t wait another minute for your
love.” I don’t mean to jump to conclusions regarding the song’s subject matter,
but honestly I’m not sure what other conclusion I’m supposed to come to with
this; it sounds like they’re trying to get the girl that’s listening to the
song to have sex with them, all five of
them. Also, keep in mind that at least one of these boys in this group was
sixteen at the time this song was released. Of course, even when I didn’t know
that, just hearing their voices gave me the impression that these guys were
just dumb middle schoolers that didn’t know anything about how relationships
worked, and weren’t exactly interested in putting forth the effort to find out.
Additionally,
it sounds like this song is trying to pull off one of those slower, softer,
smoother R&B songs that are meant to present the singer as a romantic,
suave, sensitive lover figure. I admit, I’m not a fan of this particular kind
of song, but I can at least understand the appeal. This song, however, does not
pull it off at all; it’s too forceful to match the soft, slow feel that these
songs try to go for, and the boys themselves are too young to pass themselves
off as being smooth or having the level of charisma needed for the tone these
kind of songs usually aim for.
Hi-Five:
they can’t wait another minute for my love. Unfortunately, since I have no love
to give them, they’re going to be waiting a long time.
#8
Whitney
Houston was one of the biggest, most successful female acts of all time, having
sold over 200 million records worldwide, and scoring twenty-seven top-twenty
hit songs, eleven of which were #1 hits. Her voice has become so iconic that
she was commonly referred to as ‘the Voice’. Where Michael Jackson broke many
color barriers for black male performing artists, Whitney Houston did the same
for black female performing artists. With two Emmy Awards, six Grammy Awards,
thirty Billboard Music Awards, twenty-two American Music Awards and a whopping
415 career awards as of 2012, the year where she sadly passed away, Whitney
Houston was one of the most awarded female artists of all time.
Honestly
though, I’ve never been a fan of Whitney Houston. I have the same problem with
her music that I have with Christina Aguilera; I feel like her singing was just
too overblown for me to fully enjoy. Normally I like music that demonstrates
bombast, energy and force, but Whitney Houston just tended to put too much
force into her singing, to the point that it can actually make some of her
songs seem emotionless and boring to me. Such is the case for this next song.
#8. All the Man That I Need (Whitney
Houston)
This
is actually a cover of a song by Linda Clifford from 1982. The original writers
of the song were Dean Pitchford and Michael Gore, who wrote it for Linda after
she’d just gotten out of a bad marriage some years prior, once they saw how
happy she was with her new husband. That version of the song didn’t end up
charting, but I personally prefer the original to this version. Linda
Clifford’s performance is a lot more controlled, and comes across as much more
sincere compared to Whitney Houston’s version, which is so dull and heavy that
makes it seem like she’s trying too hard to seem happy with the man she’s with
to the point she actually sounds more upset than anything. In fact, if you
really want to know how bad the Whitney Houston version is or have doubts about
it, allow me to alleviate them by pointing out that it has Kenny G on it.
Look,
from my perspective, Whitney Houston was at her best when she was singing songs
that had fast, tight instrumentation that leveled out the force behind her
singing so it didn’t overpower the rest of the song, things like ‘How Will I
Know’ or ‘I Wanna Dance With Somebody (Who Loves Me).’ Slow, dull ballads like
this do not work with her voice; she was not subtle or reserved enough to pull
off songs like this. Yes, in regards to that previous statement, I am including
‘I Will Always Love You,’ one of her most famous and iconic songs. Even so, I’d
say that even that song’s better than ‘All the Man That I Need’ because at least
that song had her trying to build the song up to her usual singing level and
trying to exercise some level of subtlety even if she didn’t really pull it
off. ‘All the Man That I Need,’ however, just keeps piling one layer of
ridiculous over-singing on top of another.
If
you don’t mind big, over-the-top ballads by Whitney Houston that have her
seriously wringing every part of them for every last drop of over-singing she
can muster, then maybe you’ll find something beautiful in this song. As for me
however, I just can’t buy into this.
#7
In
terms of transition, 1991 also saw a bit of transition in terms of its dance
music. While the ‘80s gave us mostly songs from the likes of Michael Jackson,
Madonna and Paula Abdul, the early ‘90s were right between those and the dance
songs performed by the Spice Girls, Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera and the
like. So, chances are those reading are likely not familiar with names like
Cathy Dennis, Tony Toni Toné or Deee-Lite, unless you’re huge pop music history
nerds like I am. So, within this kind of unfocused mess of differing styles of
dance music, you’ve got things like ‘3 a.m. Eternal,’ which are loud and
in-your-face, ‘Strike It Up,’ which are fairly tight and energetic, ‘Groove is
In the Heart,’ which are just light-hearted and goofy, and then you’ve got crap
like this.
#7. Temptation (Corina)
Corina
is a Latin American singer, dancer and actress who grew up in New York’s more
urban environments. She only released one album, and some of the singles she released
weren’t even on that album. However, that’s not to say she wasn’t successful;
the songs she released at the tail end of the ‘80s and all of the ones in the
‘90s ended up charting, either on the Billboard hot 100 or the dance music/club
music charts, with this song even cracking the top 10, becoming her biggest
music success so far. Personally however, this song makes my skin crawl. While
I understand that the standards for dance music are fairly low, the main
qualifier being that it actually makes the listener feel like dancing, this
song fails even in that respect.
The
main flaw that the song suffers from is lack of focus in regard to its tone.
The music is this unpleasantly eerie, almost horror film-esque track. I’m not
against dance songs, or music in general with creepy or otherworldly
atmospheres; the Gorillaz song ‘Dare’ is a perfect example of how this can be
done well. The thing is the atmosphere for this song isn’t just eerie; it’s
uncomfortable. I guess that one could arguably dance to this song, but why
would they want to? Not that there’s much else besides the unpleasant music to
latch onto from this song, since the vocals are incredibly bland, just this
kind of flat, auto tuned vocal performance that doesn’t support the rest of the
song.
Then
there’s the lyrics and subject matter of the song: the idea that it’s okay to
give in to the things that tempt you in your life; that’s just how the world
works. Either that or it’s this Corina girl’s incredibly flimsy attempt to
apologize to her ex for breaking up just to go with some other guy, with the
only presumed excuse we get being that he’s a good lay. Either way, she does
not present a strong case. So, in summary, the music seems to be trying to set
up this kind of dark atmosphere that tries to be sexy but just feels awkward
and creepy, while the lyrics seem torn between trying to break up with one guy
while describing how mind-meltingly awesome the sex with the other guy is and
ultimately it all just feels like a cluttered, unfocused mess.
By
the way, I would argue against Corina’s statement that whether the temptation
one is presented in life is wrong or right is unimportant. As a man of morbid
curiosity, I find many moments where I end up regretting letting my curiosity
get the better of me, such as when I listened to this song.
#6
American
R&B and soul singer-songwriter Keith Sweat was one of the innovators of New
Jack Swing, and was fairly successful throughout the ‘90s, having released six
studio albums by the end of the decade, and is still making albums to this day.
Admittedly, his status as a record producer and radio personality may also be
part of the reason he’s still releasing songs right now. Anyway, I actually
liked the singles off of his first album; they were fun, energetic dance songs
that I could imagine getting into. I guess I just have a weakness for New Jack
Swing, or at least good New Jack
Swing. The rest of his singles, however…
#6. I’ll Give All My Love To You (Keith
Sweat)
Unfortunately,
it seems that after his first album, Keith Sweat decided to immediately discard
any of the potential promise he had as a New Jack Swing performer and proceeded
to squander the remainder of the decade by pumping out slow, dull ballads. It
is quickly becoming clear why he has not really been brought up as a major
influential figure in ‘90s music: because after his first album he immediately
sold out and just spent the rest of the decade riding the trend of soft,
R&B ballads despite not being very good at making them.
Much
like Whitney Houston, Keith Sweat’s voice was just not made to perform slower
songs like this one. It’s not even that I find this song boring. In fact, I’d
say it has the opposite problem: there’s too much going on and it sounds like a
mess. The electric piano in this song just does not lend itself well to this
kind of soft, smooth, attempted-romantic song that Keith Sweat, and many
R&B performers for that matter, seemed to be shooting for this year,
especially when coupled with the equally unpleasant beat, which sounds and
feels like getting slapped across the face.
Much
like ‘All the Man That I Need,’ this song is an attempt to demonstrate a softer
side of the singer performing it that utterly fails to present it in a way that
works. Unlike ‘All the Man That I Need,’ however, this song wasn’t suffering
from drained atmosphere due to poor over-singing, at least not by itself.
Rather, Keith Sweat instead decided to needlessly congest the song with
incredibly awfully delivered ad libbed lines with a terrible vocal performance
that sounds like what Lil’ Wayne would sound like if he didn’t use auto tune.
Granted, Lil’ Wayne sounds awful even when he actually does use auto tune, but
that’s beside the point. With his later singles, his voice at least started
smoothing out a bit and sounding somewhat less whiny. However, that just made
it sound incredibly generic, which only continues my feeling that his career
stretched on longer than it should have.
Keith
Sweat was a flash-in-the-pan performer who should have disappeared from the
public consciousness after that first album. Instead, he’s now released ten
more albums since then and is still desperately trying to grab the public’s
attention and, based on his level of success since the end of the ‘90s, pretty
much failing to do so.
#5
In
1990, Vanilla Ice’s debut single ‘Ice Ice Baby’ became the first hip-hop single
to reach #1 on Billboard, and has been credited as having transitioned hip-hop
into greater ethnical diversity with Vanilla Ice himself becoming the first
commercially successful solo white rapper that people remember today. Since
then, this song has gone on to be viewed as one of the worst songs ever
written, probably having something to do with the fact that the sample it used
from the Queen/David Bowie collaboration song ‘Under Pressure’ was used without
permission, and that Vanilla Ice didn’t offer credit or royalties to Surge
Knight, a record producer who had helped with writing the song. To be fair, he
did end up crediting the sample from ‘Under Pressure’ to Queen and David Bowie
eventually, though not until after the song had reached #1 on Billboard, and
the issue with Surge Knight was settled in court.
As
for me, I honestly don’t hate the song that much. Yes, I will admit that it’s
an incredibly stupid song, but I can understand why both it and Vanilla Ice
were dismissed as being novelty by the general public: because Vanilla Ice
actually was a novelty act, and ‘Ice
Ice Baby’ was a novelty song. That
said though, if I were to briefly look past that detail, there are things about
‘Ice Ice Baby’ that can still be enjoyed. The sample, while stolen, is still
fairly well used, and forces some energy and driving force into the song that
Vanilla Ice fails to deliver himself. Also, while it’s arguable whether or not
the lyrics in the song are any good, plenty of them are at least memorable.
Okay,
so the only positive elements in the song are the things that have little to do
with Vanilla Ice himself, but I have at least one additional defense for this
song to offer: at least it wasn’t Vanilla Ice’s second hit single.
#5. Play That Funky Music (Vanilla Ice)
Yes,
Vanilla Ice actually had a second hit single, and it is just as bad as you
might imagine it would be. While I will admit that ‘Ice Ice Baby’ was by no
means a ‘good’ song, it was at least better than this. Whatever positive
qualities that could possibly have been gleaned from that song are completely
absent here; it’s the exact same song, but without any of the novelty or
cheesiness to justify it. The lyrics are about the exact same things as those
in ‘Ice Ice Baby,’ only less memorable or interesting. The beat structure is
almost identical, but slower and weaker.
Then
we have the sample, which if you’ve guessed already just from the title is from
the 1970s song of the same name by one-hit wonder band Wild Cherry. Right off
the bat, that is an indication of how much worse this song is than ‘Ice Ice
Baby;’ that song sampled Queen and David Bowie, so it at least had some level
of star power behind it, while this one sampled a song that was likely better
remembered than the band that performed it. Before I say anything else, I just
want to point out that, if my lack of disdain for ‘Ice Ice Baby’ is any
indication, I have nothing against sampling in music. In fact, Gotye, one of my
favorite musical artists, builds almost all of his songs off of samples of
various sound effects he creates himself. Even in the case of samples lifted
from other songs, there are still songs I like that do this, so I’m not against
that either. What I am against is songs that do it lazily or badly, like is the
case here. Vanilla Ice took whatever positive qualities there were in the
original song and excised them. The beat’s slowed down, removing whatever
energy the song may have had otherwise, the vocals lifted from the original are
so processed that they’re practically unrecognizable, and the instrumentation
from the original’s been flattened by the horrendous production. In other
words, Vanilla Ice created a song called ‘Play That Funky Music,’ and failed to
make it a song that played funky music.
The
sad part is that Vanilla Ice actually went on to get much worse. Compared to
some of his later stuff, his third album especially, ‘Play That Funky Music’ is
almost listenable. Almost. Still, I
guess it’s pretty clear now why the music-buying public wisely chose to give
‘the Ice man’ the cold shoulder.
#4
#4. One More Try (Timmy T)
I
couldn’t think of any creative segways to lead into this, so just consider this
a meta-commentary about how little effort went into this song. You know how I
brought up that shoddy production and obnoxious bass lines were common problems
in a lot of the pop songs that came out this year? Well, this song is pretty
much the complete package in terms of poor production choices in that regard.
The beat is unbearably slow, there are these obnoxious slapping noises that
have no consistent rhythm or timing, there are these pointless chimes that ring
in at the end of each line that serve no purpose, but probably the worst part
of the production in this song is the bass. Of the numerous poorly-executed
bass lines that were used this year, this one is the worst by far, sounding
like some kind of obnoxious early dubstep track that gives the impression that
the song is melting.
Looking
into the lyrics, these are probably some of the most hollow, vague and
unspecific statements I’ve ever heard in a song. “I never meant to tell you
lies?” Then why did you lie to her? What justification is there for it? For that
matter, what lies were you telling her? “If you knew how much I loved you,
you’d forgive me if you could?” Why? And even if she were inclined to forgive
you despite that incredibly condescending delivery, what’s stopping her? By the
way, as lazy as the music video is, the live video of this song’s even worse,
with Mr. Torres performing what I think are supposed to be intended as sign
language motions or something when he says the lines ‘one more try,’ but just
looking stupid, especially with the line ‘try’ being signified by several
pelvic thrusts. You stay classy up there, Timmy.
Interestingly
enough, this song, and the next two songs on this list for that matter, all
made it to the #1 spot on Billboard. All three of them were popular enough that
they received enough airplay to reach the top of the pop charts in 1991.
However, while Timmy T still performs with other freestyle acts from the late
‘80s and early ‘90s today, he hasn’t had any record of releasing any further
albums after 1992, meaning he hasn’t really had any major success past that
point. The other performers, however…
#3
So,
let’s talk about Madonna. Around the beginning of the ‘90s, Madonna had just
come fresh off the heels of her ‘Like a Prayer’ album, which pretty much
cemented her status as not just being famous, but having herself immortalized
as the queen of pop. With this album, she had essentially cemented herself as
the defining artist of the ‘80s. So, I guess it only makes sense that, with the
start of the ‘90s, we would immediately see Madonna reinvent herself in a new
way: dropping all semblance of effort in her music.
#3. Justify My Love (Madonna)
This
isn’t the worst song Madonna ever performed, but it is one of the most
controversial songs and videos of her career, if not the most, and for good
reason. The accompanying video features imagery depicting sadomasochism,
voyeurism and bisexuality, things which aren’t really that big of a deal in
music videos today, but were likely much more sensitive topics to bring up back
in the early ‘90s. And the song, naturally, matches the tone of the video
lyrically in that it’s about sex and romance. In a sense, this song is kind of
avant-garde in that sense, since it’s a bit more explicit regarding its subject
matter than some of Madonna’s earlier songs. However, it’s kind of a shame that
the song’s musical tone doesn’t really match up with that of the lyrics. Not to
mention it started Madonna’s tendency of speaking the lyrics in her songs
rather than singing them, which she would continue using through her next
album, ‘Erotica,’ along with the sexually explicit lyrics and dull, uninspired
music.
Speaking
of which, let’s look at the music to this, or what little there is. I think Jim
Farber’s description of the song as “some vague, tuneless phrases chanted in
Madonna’s most breathless voice over a minimal house groove” is entirely
accurate, and not in an endearing way. While I’m not a fan of songs that are
incredibly overproduced, that doesn’t mean I necessarily enjoy minimalism. There
are situations where it can work, but here it does not. Much like ‘Temptation,’
the song just comes across as uncomfortable. At the very least though, as bad
as that song is, I could at least imagine people almost being able to dance to
it. With this song, however, the main idea seems to be sexual exploration, and
there’s nothing interesting or explorative about the song itself, just the
video. So, if you take the video out of the equation, the song pretty much
loses any context or meaning.
Also,
regarding the lack of effort statement I mentioned earlier, it’s not just
evident in the fact that Madonna chose to speak the lyrics to the song rather
than bother trying to sing, but also in the fact that the song wasn’t even
written by Madonna. In her previous albums, she proved that she was really good
at coming up with her own lyrical material and taking what she saw as a fairly
limited vocal range and still finding ways to use it well. Here, she’s building
a song out of something other people wrote, though admittedly she corrected a
single line in the song, and rather than singing herself, is just speaking the
lyrics while having a background singer sing six words during the chorus;
that’s it.
In
fact, the song’s background is much more interesting than the song itself. The
majority of the song was originally a poem written by Prince’s protégé and
friend Ingrid Chavez for Lenny Kravitz, with Kravitz adding the title hook and
chorus. Of course, when Chavez wasn’t credited on the song, she sued Kravitz
the following year, resulting in the case being resolved out of court and
Chavez receiving a co-writing credit.
From
what I’ve been told, it sounds like the song gained its popularity almost
entirely through the controversy. That doesn’t say good things about the song,
which doesn’t really have anything else going for it besides that. Ignoring the
uncomfortable atmosphere, this song is just terribly boring. The main reason
for this could just be that the song didn’t really have a major goal in mind,
and wasn’t really trying to be anything more than what it was. Sadly, the next
two songs don’t have that excuse.
#2
I’m
going to have to apologize right now because I know there are people that like
this next song and will probably be really upset or angry that I’m putting it
on this list, let alone this high. So, let me just reiterate that this is
purely an opinion-based list and is not meant to reflect badly on the reader in
any way. If you like this song, or any of the songs on this list for that
matter, that’s fine; more power to you. That said, I think this song is
complete garbage.
#2. More Than Words (Extreme)
I’d
like to believe myself to be a fairly lenient man. I’ve willingly played
through numerous video games that my friends have expressed distaste for,
including some widely panned games, and willingly listened to various songs I
was told were terrible, some of which I felt weren’t all that bad. However, the
opening notes of this song alone make my blood boil and set off a bomb of rage
in my mind. “But why?” some of you are probably asking, “Why do you hate this
song so much? It’s a touching, soft, romantic song, isn’t it? What is there to
hate about it? How could such a sweet song like this possibly be one of the
worst songs to come out this year?”
Well, let me count the ways!
First
of all, let’s look at the production: it’s a song played by white guys on an
acoustic guitar, a four-chord song at that. That alone indicates a serious lack
of effort on the part of the songwriters, but with the only noticeable
structure being two chords interspersed with guitar slaps that just makes it
sound even lazier. Add the fact that, at the time the band Extreme recorded
this song, they had four members and two of them aren’t even on the song, which
the music video doesn’t even pretend to hide, and the fact that prior to this
song’s release they mostly recorded funk and heavy metal and I’m just left
flabbergasted as to how they wound up releasing a song like this! To call this
a ‘boy scout campfire song’ would be doing a disservice to boy scouts and
campfire songs!
And
then we get to the lyrical content and subject matter of the song. The title
means exactly what you would expect it to mean; ‘More Than Words,’ the
expression of emotions by transcending words. In this case, the idea is to
express one’s love for another without using the words ‘I love you,’ which
according to the band had pretty much lost meaning since people would just use
the phrase as a lazy way to try and patch things up after friction in a relationship.
I kind of understand what they mean, but even so this is still an incredibly
pretentious concept to build your song around, and if you’re going to write a
song about something like this you should at least bring forth something that
expresses effort to show your own disdain for the lack of effort other people
have started putting forth regarding the expression of love, which this song
utterly fails to do. There are grammatical errors in the bridge and first verse
of the song, and lines just kind of seem to blend into each other without rhyme
or reason. That wouldn’t be a problem if this were a stream-of-consciousness
type song, but it’s not; it was written with the intention of being a clear,
concise statement to another person.
If
these were the only problems I had with the song, then I’d just dismiss it as
being annoyingly pretentious, but little else. There are worse things that a
song can be than that. However, the way the song’s written, it sounds like the
narrator is specifically talking to you, the listener, not to express his love
for you, but demanding that you do so for him! This is exactly the same kind of
condescending, narcissistic arrogance that King Leer demonstrated at the
beginning of the Shakespeare play of the same name when he demanded his
daughters flatter him by telling him how much they loved him so they could
inherit his land. And how did that end again? Oh yeah, that’s right; the two
daughters that humored his demands ended up stabbing him in the back while he
ended up banishing the actual loyal daughter, only realizing his mistake after
it was too late, and ending the play holding her dead body in his arms. It’s
not a perfect one-to-one comparison, but I’m still getting the same kind of
attitude from the narrator of this song. In other words, it’s a song that was
written to lament the loss of meaning in the words ‘I love you,’ that
forcefully demands the listener to show their love for the narrator without
saying those words.
Furthermore,
for all the song goes on about wanting the listener to express love to the
narrator, said narrator doesn’t do much of anything to express any kind of
interest in the person being addressed, romantic or otherwise. The closest the
song gets is the line, “It’s not that I want you not to say,” in the second
line of the first verse, but that’s just an indicator that the narrator wants
the listener to say ‘I love you,’ not that he actually loves them. And even if
the narrator does love the listener, this is basically just saying, “Well, you
could just tell me that you love me, but that would be too easy. Show me your
love for me!” This goes beyond just being pretentious and arrogant; this is the
most hollow, demeaning, insulting, obnoxious, insincere plea for love from the
listener I have ever heard in a song. Say what you want about ‘(Everything I
Do) I Do It For You;’ at least the narrator in that song expressed interest in
the person he was singing to!
How
ironic is it that a song that specifically laments the lack of effort being put
in the expression of love between people in relationships demonstrates no
effort whatsoever in expressing love between the performers and their audience?
By the way ‘Extreme,’ I know exactly what I would say if you were to take the
words ‘I,’ ‘love’ and ‘you’ away: “Fuck off,
assholes!”
#1
I
really wanted to pick ‘More Than Words’ as the number one song for this list.
In fact, if this list were purely based on my level of hatred for a given song,
it would have been the number one without question. However, as much as I loathe
that song, there is one, and only one
positive thing I can say about it that puts it head and shoulders above the
song that did make the number one spot on this list: ‘More Than Words’ actually
set a goal for itself. It absolutely failed to accomplish that goal on every
conceivable level, but it at least made just enough effort to pick something
that it wanted to achieve. The same can most definitely not be said of this
next song, which is just as pretentious as ‘More Than Words,’ but with no purpose,
no greater good in mind when it was created. So, without further ado, I present
to you the absolute worst hit song from 1991:
#1. From A Distance (Bette Midler)
To
understand just how bad this song is, first we’ll need to look at its history.
Songwriter Julie Gold originally wrote the song in 1985. Eventually, after
presenting it to numerous artists and record companies, none of whom wanted to
record it, she sent it to Nanci Griffith, asking her what was wrong with it
rather than the umpteen-hundred other people that she sent the song to that
turned it down. Ms. Griffith, however, loved the song and ended up recording
the original version of the song in 1987.
That
version failed to chart, and rightly so because when you get down to it this
song is just mindless, uninspired fluff from beginning to end. The first verse
is just descriptions of the most mundane details, some of which aren’t even
accurate. “From a distance, the earth is blue and green and the snow-capped
mountains white”? Not really. I mean, yeah the earth is mostly blue from space
and it has green patches on it, but in terms of mountains, those look more
light brown than white. There are whites on there, but those are clouds, not
mountains. “From a distance the ocean meets the stream and the eagle takes to
flight”? Oceans don’t flow into streams, genius.
However,
it’s the second and third verses that really take the cake in terms of trying
to pass off more depth and meaning than they can actually back up. The second
verse talks about how, from a distance, the world is a place where everyone has
what they need, there’s no guns, no bombs, no illness and everyone’s happy.
That seems to suggest that the singer’s trying to point out the ignorance of
the listener regarding the problems in the world, which by itself is incredibly
condescending. Tell me though, at what point does the song actually give any
kind of perspective or commentary about any of those things that actually adds
up to something? Does it build up to a shocking, uncomfortable realization of
the horrific reality that contrasts so much with the seemingly happy image we
choose to see? Does it call people out on their own decision to live in
ignorance? Nope! We just get different variations of a chorus about how
everyone plays songs of peace, love, hope and all that sugary goodness. Gag me!
And
then there’s the third verse, which can basically be whittled down to three
words: war is bad. It mentions that people on opposite sides in a war aren’t
any different from one another in terms of the lives they lead and when you get
down to it they’re just normal folks, but again it doesn’t do anything
substantial or meaningful with it. It just kind of mentions it and then
completely disregards it. I’m not really big into anti-war songs myself, but I
can at least understand and relate to the sentiments behind them because there
are those that can present a case as to why war is bad. This song, however,
presents incredibly simplistic thoughts that seem to be trying to expose the
ignorance of the listener, but in fact only serve to paint the narrator as the
ignorant one.
This
version of the song came out around the time of the Persian-Gulf War in 1990,
which I think is the only reason it became a hit, not because it was relevant
to the war, but because it was riding on people’s anti-war sentimentality. I
don’t necessarily blame Bette Midler for this song being as bad as it is, but
her cover does not do anything to salvage the song in any way, which I feel
actually kind of makes it worse in a sense because she kept the song almost
identical to the original version. The only thing she really does add is
additional repetitions of the phrase ‘God is watching us from a distance’ at
the end of the song. However, that only brings up another problem: the idea
that God is watching from a distance seems to suggest that God is completely
aware of all the terrible things going on in the world, but just chooses to sit
back and let them happen. That, in turn, suggests that God is either lazy or
apathetic to the suffering of the people of the Earth.
This
song presents all these half-thoughts and barely-tangible perspectives in some
vain attempt to try and add depth and meaning to itself. Instead, all they do
is expose the narrator’s own ignorance and lack of understanding, with
everything said presented in a way that betrays the meaning behind it. And it
is for that reason that it is my choice for the worst hit song of 1991.
We’re
not done yet though, folks; join me on my next list, where we’ll be following
up on this list by counting off the top ten best
hit songs of 1991.
No comments:
Post a Comment